Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Barbados

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
S.M. v. Barbados 502/1992 31 March 1994   Inadmissible
Bradshaw v. Barbados 489/1992 19 July 1994   Inadmissible
Roberts v. Barbados 504/1992 19 July 1994   Inadmissible
Leonid Sudalenko and Anatoly Poplavny v. Belarus 2190/2012 04 April 2018 2 (2) and (3), 19 and 21 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".