|
|
Jurisprudence
CAT - Republic of Serbia
List of all final views
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Ristic v. Yugoslavia |
113/1998 |
11 May 2001 |
2, 12, 13, 14, 16 |
Violation |
| Hajrizi Dzemajl et al. v. Serbia and Montenegro |
161/2000 |
21 November 2002 |
12,13,14,16(1) |
Violation |
| Dimitrijevic v. Serbia and Montenegro |
207/2002 |
24 November 2004 |
1, 2(1), 12, 13, 14 |
Violation |
| Dimitrov v. Serbia and Montenegro |
171/2000 |
03 May 2005 |
1, 2(1),12, 13, 14 |
Violation |
| Dimitrijevic v. Serbia and Montenegro |
172/2000 |
16 November 2005 |
1, 2(1), 12, 13, 14 |
Violation |
| Nikolic v. Serbia and Montenegro (V) |
174/2000 |
24 November 2005 |
12, 13 |
Violation |
| Osmani v. Republic of Serbia |
261/2005 |
08 May 2009 |
12, 13, 14, 16 |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
